A Generation Gap Turns Into A Credibility Gap

You may recall that, earlier this year, Gay Talese took heavy criticism at a literary conference for being unable to name any women writers who inspired him.  At the time, I defended him, thinking the flap indicated a generation gap between writers, something I continue to believe.

What I cannot defend, however, is the authorial sloppiness that lies behind his apology for being taken in by the main subject and source for his latest book, The Voyeur’s Motel.  The fellow who says that he was the owner of a particular motel and witnessed for years all sorts of things through a peephole in that motel didn’t even own the motel for eight years he claimed he did.  The problem is, the elderly Talese took his word lock, stock, and barrel, didn’t bother to check his facts, and stuck with writing his book for years before another investigation brought the falsehood to light.

Authors who build non-fiction books largely on the narratives of other people (Studs Terkel, John McPhee, and Robert Caro come to mind) are at risk of this sort of thing happening, but they usually safeguard themselves by interviewing multiple sources, each of whom will confirm or refute the original source.  That’s how they know the original, main source is reliable.  Talese didn’t do that work in this case.  As a result, he’s taken the unusual step of disavowing the book he’s written.  What’s even more amazing to me, though, is that Grove Press is evidently going to publish the book anyway as scheduled, on July 12.  I guess they have too much money invested in printing costs to back out, although if the breach of truthfulness  is as bad as it appears to be, they should back out. I can’t imagine enough readers would be interested in it to read it.  Talese has left himself with nothing to stand on here, even with the apology.  The error is not tantalizing or provocative; it’s just a kind of sloppiness, committed by a writer who needs to retire more than he needs to work.

Advertisements
Standard

3 thoughts on “A Generation Gap Turns Into A Credibility Gap

  1. There’s some kind of disturbing mirror being held up here…large and wide, how important is truth anymore?

    I was not aware of this, John, and need to go read more about it. (I haven’t read Gay Talese since my undergrad/bookstore working, years…)

    • Me neither, really. *Thy Neighbor’s Wife,* though provocative, depended on relatively few sources for some sweeping generalizations about marital fidelity. By contrast, Studs Terkel always talked to what seemed to me a *wide* range of people for his books, and Robert Caro is *usually* careful with an enormous number sources.

      You and I both know that truth exists within a range of human experience, and it is the *facts*–whatever they may be–that get us closest to the truth; that’s why we need them. The truth is very important and crucial to express. It is seldom found when it is in the service of some ideology; it is more often found when some man or woman is working to put food on the table or words on the page. You are a servant of the truth in your writing, and I hope you will continue to be one. Your work is more important than you realize.

  2. Pingback: “Oops, I Didn’t Mean It,” He Said | Books Here And There

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s